On 3/19/24 11:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/03/2024 14:06, Ayush Singh wrote:
> Are you sure this fits in Linux coding style limit (not checkpatch
limit, but the limit expressed by Linux coding style)?
Well, I am just using clang-format with column width of 100 instead of
80. The docs now say 80 is prefered rather than mandatory, so well I was
So you introduce your own style? Then consider it mandatory...
using 100 since I prefer that. If 80 is necessary or would make review
easier than I can just switch to it.
You do not choose your own coding style.
I will remove serdev, pwm, clickID and send a new patch with the minimal
driver and better commit messages as suggested with Vaishnav. It is
important to have good support for mikroBUS boards without clickID as well.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
I mean after the whole discussion about 80 vs 100 column line limit a
few years ago, and change in checkpatch behavior, I thought 100 was an
acceptable column length in the kernel, but I guess was mistaken, and 80
character is still mandatory? Not sure why there was a change in
checkpatch and docs though.
Regardless, I have switched 80 in the next patch since it is mandatory,
and I do not care as long as I can format using a formatter.
Ayush Singh
