On 3/18/24 11:40, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:08:00AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: >> On 3/17/24 11:10, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> > Additionally, should >> > they fall back to t1023-sfp? I see that there's already some dts files >> > with these compatibles in them but seemingly no driver support as there >> > is for the t1023-sfp. >> >> I checked the reference manuals for these processors, and all of them use TA 2.0. > > Sounds like a fallback is suitable then, although that will require > updating the various dts files. Yes, a fallback (like what is done for the T-series) would be suitable, but given that these devicetrees have been in-tree for eight years I think it would be preferable to support the existing bindings for compatibility purposes. --Sean
