On 15/03/2024 22:15, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> AMD-Xilinx Versal and Versal-NET are successor of ZynqMP platform. ZynqMP
> remoteproc driver is mostly compatible with new platforms except few
> platform specific differences.
>
> Versal has same IP of cortex-R5 cores hence maintained compatible string
> same as ZynqMP platform. However, hardcode TCM addresses are not
> supported for new platforms and must be provided in device-tree as per
> new bindings. This makes TCM representation data-driven and easy to
> maintain. This check is provided in the driver.
>
> For Versal-NET platform, TCM doesn't need to be configured in lockstep
> mode or split mode. Hence that call to PMC firmware is avoided in the
> driver for Versal-NET platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> index d4a22caebaad..193bc159d1b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -323,9 +323,12 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> + /* TCM configuration is not needed in versal-net */
> + if (device_is_compatible(r5_core->dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5f")) {
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -933,10 +936,17 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> int ret, i;
>
> r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
> +
> + /*
> + * New platforms must use device tree for TCM parsing.
> + * Only ZynqMP uses hardcode TCM.
> + */
> if (of_find_property(r5_core->np, "reg", NULL))
> ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
> - else
> + else if (of_machine_is_compatible("xlnx,zynqmp"))
> ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
That's poor code. Your drivers should not depend on platform. I don't
understand why you need to do this and how is even related to this patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
