On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:20:28AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > linux,sml-base holds the address of a buffer with the TPM log. This > buffer may become invalid after a kexec. To avoid accessing an invalid > address or corrupted buffer, embed the whole TPM log in the device tree > property linux,sml-log. This helps to protect the log since it is > properly carried across a kexec soft reboot with both of the kexec > syscalls. > > Avoid having the firmware ingest the whole TPM log when calling > prom_setprop but only create the linux,sml-log property as a place holder. > Insert the actual TPM log during the tree flattening phase. > > Fixes: 4a727429abec ("PPC64: Add support for instantiating SML from Open Firmware") > Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c > index e67effdba85c..6f7ca72013c2 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c > @@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ static cell_t __prombss regbuf[1024]; > > static bool __prombss rtas_has_query_cpu_stopped; > > +static u64 __prombss sml_base; > +static u32 __prombss sml_size; Should inside an #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 since prom_instantiate_sml() is? > > /* > * Error results ... some OF calls will return "-1" on error, some > @@ -1954,17 +1956,15 @@ static void __init prom_instantiate_sml(void) > } > prom_printf(" done\n"); > > - reserve_mem(base, size); > - > - prom_setprop(ibmvtpm_node, "/vdevice/vtpm", "linux,sml-base", > - &base, sizeof(base)); > - prom_setprop(ibmvtpm_node, "/vdevice/vtpm", "linux,sml-size", > - &size, sizeof(size)); > - > - prom_debug("sml base = 0x%llx\n", base); > + /* Add property now, defer adding log to tree flattening phase */ > + prom_setprop(ibmvtpm_node, "/vdevice/vtpm", "linux,sml-log", > + NULL, 0); > prom_debug("sml size = 0x%x\n", size); > > prom_debug("prom_instantiate_sml: end...\n"); > + > + sml_base = base; > + sml_size = size; > } > > /* > @@ -2645,6 +2645,17 @@ static void __init scan_dt_build_struct(phandle node, unsigned long *mem_start, > } > prev_name = sstart + soff; > > + if (!prom_strcmp("linux,sml-log", pname)) { > + /* push property head */ > + dt_push_token(OF_DT_PROP, mem_start, mem_end); > + dt_push_token(sml_size, mem_start, mem_end); > + dt_push_token(soff, mem_start, mem_end); > + /* push property content */ > + valp = make_room(mem_start, mem_end, sml_size, 1); > + memcpy(valp, (void *)sml_base, sml_size); > + *mem_start = ALIGN(*mem_start, 4); > + continue; > + } Same question as above. Regards, Jerry > /* get length */ > l = call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, pname); > > -- > 2.43.0 >