On 8/03/24 23:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 10:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:36 AM Gregory CLEMENT >>> <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>> The Allied Telesis x530 products have a 7-segment LED display which is >>>>> used for node identification when the devices are stacked. Represent >>>>> this as a gpio-7-segment device. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Normally, this patch should be taken in mvebu and then merged by >>>> arm-soc. However, I haven't seen any other patch touching this file (so >>>> no risk of merge conflict) and I think it's too late for me to make a >>>> new pull request to arm-soc. So I'm not against it being taken with the >>>> rest of the patches. However, I think it would be a good idea to see >>>> what Arnd thinks about it. >>> Arnd wasn't Cc'ed, now I added him. >> I already have a 'late' branch for stuff that for some reason >> was too late be part of the normal pull requests but should >> still make it into 6.9. If this one is important, I don't >> mind taking it. >> >> On the other hand, from the patch description this one doesn't >> seem that urgent, so I don't see much harm in delaying it >> to v6.10, and using the normal process for it. > Thanks, I will defer this one then. > Chris, please handle this one after v6.9-rc1 is out. The first two I'm > going to take today. > No problem. I can send the dts changes separately. FYI ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell isn't picking up Arnd should it?
