Re: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/01/2024 13:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
This series simplifies it.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Applied, thanks


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux