On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:38:52AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:04 AM Yangyu Chen <cyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Since we have Canaan Kendryte K230 with MMU now. The use of SOC_CANAAN > > is no longer only referred to K210. Split them and add _K210 suffix > > to the name for old SOC_CANAAN. And allows ARCH_CANAAN to be selected > > for other Canaan SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 8 +++++--- > > arch/riscv/Makefile | 2 +- > > arch/riscv/configs/nommu_k210_defconfig | 3 ++- > > arch/riscv/configs/nommu_k210_sdcard_defconfig | 3 ++- > > drivers/clk/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > drivers/reset/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > drivers/soc/Makefile | 2 +- > > drivers/soc/canaan/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > 9 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > This patch cross so many subsystems, I am not sure about it. If I were > you, I would keep SOC_CANAAN and just add SOC_CANAAN_K230. Right. That is why I didn't try to rename the symbol, and just left it as SOC_CANAAN, but if the relevant people ack it, the chances of a significant conflict are low.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature