Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:48 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> > > relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Andi, can you pick these up?

I already did since you gave your reviewed-by and they hadn't
otherwise been picked up.

> Or you negotiate with Rob how you want to handle I2C DT patches. I
> agreed with him that I usually take them. Except for generic cleanups or
> so.

Yes, that is my preference. And how most subsystems work for bindings.

Rob





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux