Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qrb2210-rb1: enable Type-C support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:51:27AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 11:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:26:09AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > Reuse Type-C support implemented for the PMI632 PMIC (found on Qualcomm
> > > > Robotics RB2 platform) and implement Type-C handling for the Qualcomm
> > > > Robotics RB1 platform.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Patch 1 added, 2 did not apply to my tree :(
> >
> > Thank you!
> > Yes, patch 2 should go through arm-soc.
>
> Having patch series where each one goes to a different tree makes it
> really hard for maintainers to know what to do, and our tools want to
> take a whole series, not individual ones.  Next time perhaps split it
> up?

Ack, I'll keep this in mind when submitting series against usb-next.
I have always been on the other side, because splitting the series
makes the life of the reviewers and testers harder. With single series
I can review, apply and test it as a whole item. With the feature
being split, I have to collect all the driver changes and also the DT
changes to be able to evaluate whether the approach is sensible or
not.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux