On 24-02-27 16:45:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/02/2024 16:55, Abel Vesa wrote: > > Add the X1E80100 to the list of compatibles and document the is-edp > > flag. The controllers are expected to operate in DP mode by default, > > and this flag can be used to select eDP mode. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > > index ae53cbfb2193..ed11852e403d 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties: > > - qcom,sdm845-dp > > - qcom,sm8350-dp > > - qcom,sm8650-dp > > + - qcom,x1e80100-dp > > - items: > > - enum: > > - qcom,sm8150-dp > > @@ -73,6 +74,11 @@ properties: > > - description: phy 0 parent > > - description: phy 1 parent > > > > + is-edp: > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag > > + description: > > + Tells the controller to switch to eDP mode > > > DP controller cannot be edp, so property "is-edp" is confusing. Probably > you want to choose some phy mode, so you should rather use "phy-mode" > property. I am sure we've been here... phy-mode in controller node or in the phy node? > > Anyway, if you define completely new property without vendor prefix, > that's a generic property, so you need to put it in some common schema > for all Display Controllers, not only Qualcomm. I can re-spin with qcom,is-edp if that's better. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
