On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> > Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
> > vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
> > parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
> > result in better performance.
> >
> > Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
> > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?
>
> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.
>
> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex
I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily
backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2
and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily
backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we
squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1.
Let me know how you want to proceed.
Thanks,
Nícolas
