Hello. On 02/02/2015 02:05 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Add the initial device tree for the R8A7794 SoC based SILK low cost board. SCIF2 serial port support is included, so that the serial console can work.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
Index: renesas/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7794-silk.dts =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ renesas/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7794-silk.dts @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +/* + * Device Tree Source for the SILK board + * + * Copyright (C) 2014 Renesas Electronics Corporation + * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Renesas Solutions Corp. + * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Cogent Embedded, Inc. + * + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any + * kind, whether express or implied. + */ + +/dts-v1/; +#include "r8a7794.dtsi" + +/ { + model = "SILK";
Shouldn't that have a "Renesas" prefix or something like that?
Historically. no SH-Mobile .dts has used the vendor name in the "model" prop. I defer the decision to Simon but I think we should be at least consistent.
It's unlikely that there will be another board called "SILK", but it does make it hard for someone to get an idea of what the board is from the model string alone.
Tend to agree here.
Mark.
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
