> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:11:23AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:39:45AM +0800, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> > > StarFive JH8100 uses the same OpenCores PWM controller as JH7110.
> > > Mark JH8100 as compatible to the OpenCores PWM controller.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > This patch depends on patch [1] ("dt-bindings: pwm: Add bindings for
> > > OpenCores PWM Controller") in Conor's riscv-dt-for-next branch.
> > > [1]
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/comm
> > > it/?h=riscv-dt-for-next&id=2529085831b01fcd02ff58ab4e2596d3b31bcf80
> >
> > I recommend to make use of git format-patch's --base parameter to
> > additionally(!) make this information available to the build bots.
>
> I like the "additionally" :)
Alright, I will take note of that. Thanks
> >
> > Looks fine to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Coner: If you're happy with this patch, please apply it in the same
> > way as the initial OpenCores PWM Controller binding patch.
>
> Ye, I can do. Although, I suppose this is an example of why the driver maintainers applying the bindings is preferred, even if the driver
> patch itself isn't ready or there is no driver patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
