On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:24:47 +0000 Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:08:25PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > Per i.MX93 Reference Mannual Rev.4, 12/2013, there is no interrupt 268, > > so drop it. > > Don't just remove it from the example, drop it from the binding too? > It does permit a 4th "self testing" interrupt. I'm missing something. See below... > > Thanks, > Conor. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nxp,imx93-adc.yaml | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nxp,imx93-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nxp,imx93-adc.yaml > > index dacc526dc695..dfc3f512918f 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nxp,imx93-adc.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nxp,imx93-adc.yaml > > @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ properties: > > - description: normal conversion, include EOC (End of Conversion), > > ECH (End of Chain), JEOC (End of Injected Conversion) and > > JECH (End of injected Chain). > > - - description: Self-testing Interrupts. Eyes skipped over this maybe? The 4th interrupt is removed from binding here... > > > > clocks: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -70,8 +69,7 @@ examples: > > reg = <0x44530000 0x10000>; > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 217 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > <GIC_SPI 218 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > - <GIC_SPI 219 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > - <GIC_SPI 268 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + <GIC_SPI 219 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > clocks = <&clk IMX93_CLK_ADC1_GATE>; > > clock-names = "ipg"; > > vref-supply = <®_vref_1v8>; > > -- > > 2.37.1 > >
