On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 20/02/24 1:50 pm, Lee Jones wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >> Hi Krzysztof, > >> > >> On 12/02/24 3:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > >>> > >>> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 05:47:33 +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > >>>>> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format. > >>>>> > >>>>> Align clocks and clock-names properties to clearly indicate that the LCD > >>>>> controller expects lvds_pll_clk when interfaced with the lvds display. This > >>>>> alignment with the specific hardware requirements ensures accurate device tree > >>>>> configuration for systems utilizing the HLCDC IP. > >>>>> > >>>>> [...] > >>>> > >>>> Applied, thanks! > >>>> > >>>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format > >>>> commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a > >>>> > >>> > >>> Next is still failing. > >>> > >>> Dharma, > >>> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches. > >> > >> I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by the oversight. I have > >> organized the patches according to their dependencies in the patch > >> series, but unfortunately, I neglected to explicitly mention these > >> dependencies. I understand the importance of clear communication in our > >> collaborative efforts. Please feel free to provide guidance on how I can > >> assist you further in resolving this matter. > > > > If this continues to be an issue, I can just remove the commit. > > There won't be any issue if both pwm and display binding goes before the > mfd binding. > > Could you please pick the display binding as well? Only with an ACK from the relevant Maintainers. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
