Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: typec-tcpci: add tcpci fallback binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24-02-22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/02/2024 22:28, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > The NXP PTN5110 [1] is an TCPCI [2] compatible chip, so add the fallback
> > binding.
> > 
> > [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PTN5110.pdf
> > [2] https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/documents/usb-port_controller_specification_rev2.0_v1.0_0.pdf
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - rephrase commit message
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > index eaedb4cc6b6c..7bd7bbbac9e0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ maintainers:
> >  
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    const: nxp,ptn5110
> > +    enum:
> > +      - nxp,ptn5110
> > +      - tcpci
> 
> That's not a fallback, but enum. Fallback is "items" and then you could

Damn, you're right. Sorry.

> also send a follow-up patchset (separate, so Greg won't take it) fixing
> DTS (if not, let me know, so I will fix it).

Sry. but I don't get this. Why do I need to send a follow-up? Greg did
not apply anything, at least I didn't received an e-mail, that this
patchset was picked.

Regards,
  Marco


> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux