On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/02/2024 18:11, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 2/15/24 23:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a > >> common schema for that. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > From hwmon perspective: > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml > >> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause > >> +%YAML 1.2 > >> +--- > >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# > >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >> + > >> +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties > >> + > >> +maintainers: > >> + - Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> + > >> +properties: > >> + label: > >> + description: A descriptive name for this device. > >> + > > > > Would it make sense to also add shunt-resistor-micro-ohms ? > > It's not present on many devices, I think, so it is also not parsed by > hwmon core. I plan to add above $ref to hwmon-common to each hwmon > binding, so this would mean all of them will get shunt-resistor. I would > not add it, but I also don't mind if I am overruled. I count 11 users. That's enough for me to add it here. I care less if a device uses a defined property it doesn't need. I'm more worried about having any undefined property allowed. Rob