On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:03:03AM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:51:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:38:45AM -0700, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:59:56AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:58:29PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > + "^calao,.*": > > > > > + description: CALAO Systems SAS > > > > > "^calaosystems,.*": > > > > > description: CALAO Systems SAS > > > > > > > > > + "^IBM,.*": > > > > > + description: International Business Machines (IBM) > > > > > "^ibm,.*": > > > > > description: International Business Machines (IBM) > > > > > > > > These ones add duplicates with no indication of which one is to be used > > > > going forward. Why not mark one as deprecated? > > > > > > Because I couldn't decide which... It's a mixture with no clear pattern > > > of on what or when each one is used. Power is kind of special. > > > > That might be true for ibm, but is it true for calao systems? > > The website appears to now be something to do with Korean gambling, but > > the twitter remains and looks to have produced arm sbcs: > > https://twitter.com/calaosystems?lang=en > > I used this: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calao_Systems > > The company went bankrupt in 2016. Yah. I found the twitter to provide more info about the type of chips they used than wikipedia though, since I was trying to confirm whether or not they were power. > ST based systems used one prefix and > Atmel based systems used the other. Which do I pick to deprecate? I'm > not expecting any new boards either. I guess, if nothing new will show up since the company itself got deprecated, it doesn;t really matter.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
