On 24-02-21 15:41:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 21.02.2024 15:38, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Add nodes for SMB2360 with the eUSB2 repeater nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8d7bdb56e6fe
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > +};
> > +
> > +&spmi_bus1 {
> > + smb2360h: pmic@7 {
>
> Hm, I'm not 100% sure about bringing in this letter-suffix notation..
>
> But then, is there anything better? What are they called in schematics?
> SMB2360_n, perhaps?
Yeah, just realized that this is wrong. I need to do something like
sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi.
There are different sources of information for the suffix, some of them
use smb2360k, some of them use smb2360_0. Will go with the second.
>
> konrad
