On 21/02/2024 06:15, Shenghao Ding wrote:
> PCM6240 family chips are popular among audio customers, in spite of only a
> portion of the functionality of codec, such as ADC or DAC, and so on, for
> different Specifications, range from Personal Electric to Automotive
> Electric, even some professional fields. Yet their audio performance is far
> superior to the codec's, and cost is lower than codec, and much easier to
> program than codec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@xxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Change in v5:
?!? You got review which you ignored. Now you rewrite everything?
> - Rewrite the subject to match something similar to other commits.
> - And none of them are compatible with something.
> - minItems, then maxItems.
> - Drop reset-gpios description
> - Remove the repeated reg descriptions and reg constraints.
> - Drop redundant spaces.
> - Add missing line breaks between blocks and additionalProperties.
> - Correct compatibility issue on adc6120 and pcm6240.
> - All these chips have only a portion of the functionality of codec,
> such as ADC or DAC, and so on, but their audio performance is far
> superior to the codec's, and cost is lower than codec, and much easier
> to program than codec. Simply one or two register settings can enable
> them to work. Init for these chips are hardware reset or software reset.
> As to some audio filter params for internal filters, it is up to the
> special user cases, which can be saved into the bin file. The default
> value also can work well.
> - Add blank line before reg.
> - remove unneeded items and if branches.
> - Add missing compatible devices, such as adc6120, etc.
> - Add necessary people into the list for DTS review
> - correct misaligned.
> - simplify the compatibility
> - Add sound-name-prefix
Didn't you do all this?
...
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + Invalid only for ti,pcm1690 because of no INT pin.
> +
> + sound-name-prefix: true
Drop
> +
> + '#sound-dai-cells':
> + const: 0
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: dai-common.yaml#
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - ti,pcm1690
> + then:
> + properties:
> + interrupts: false
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
unevaluatedProperties
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> + i2c {
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
