Re: [PATCH v10 00/14] PCI: imx6: Clean up and add imx95 pci support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:21:28AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:08:17AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:51:17AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:18:03AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 09:42:08PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:11:45AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:33:21PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > > > > first 6 patches use drvdata: flags to simplify some switch-case code.
> > > > > > > Improve maintaince and easy to read code.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > @Lorenzo Pieralisi:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	Do you have chance to look other patches?
> > > > > > 	Mani's apply EP side change. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Even though the controller is for the endpoint, it is still a controller
> > > > > driver. So all the patches should go through Lorenzo.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I only merge patches under drivers/pci/endpoint. Hope this clarifies.
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry. It confused everyone. My means was that Mani applied Niklas Cassel's
> > > > patches, which cause my 14th patch build failure.
> > > 
> > > Hello Frank,
> > > 
> > > Patch 14, which adds this:
> > > 
> > > +static const struct pci_epc_features imx95_pcie_epc_features = {
> > > +       .msi_capable = true,
> > > +       .bar_fixed_size[1] = SZ_64K,
> > > +       .align = SZ_4K,
> > > +};
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Should, after rebasing on Mani's pci/endpoint branch, instead look like this:
> > > 
> > > +static const struct pci_epc_features imx95_pcie_epc_features = {
> > > +       .msi_capable = true,
> > > +       .bar[BAR_1] = { .type = BAR_FIXED, .fixed_size = SZ_64K, },
> > > +       .align = SZ_4K,
> > > +};
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I asked if I need update my 14th patch or applied 1-13 only. 
> > > 
> > > I see, you want the maintainers to apply 1-13, and simply drop patch 14
> > > instead of you sending out a rebased series.
> > > 
> > > I assume that the maintainers will be fine with your suggested approach.
> > 
> > If patch 14 has no dependencies on 1-13 yes; if it does we need to
> > coordinate the merge between branches in the PCI tree.
> 
> Keep it easy. I rebase to linux-pci/endpoint and v11 patch sent out.
> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240220161924.3871774-1-Frank.Li@xxxxxxx/T/#t

Bjorn just merge endpoint to next. v11 will work with linux-pci/next.

Frank

> 
> Frank
> 
> > 
> > Lorenzo




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux