On Mon Feb 19, 2024 at 10:06 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/02/2024 09:44, Michael Walle wrote: > > Add the compatible string for the Kontron 3.5"-SBC-i1200 single board > > computer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: > > - convert enum to const as there is only one specific board > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml > > index 09f9ffd3ff7b..add167d8b8da 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml > > @@ -357,6 +357,11 @@ properties: > > - radxa,nio-12l > > - const: mediatek,mt8395 > > - const: mediatek,mt8195 > > + - description: Kontron 3.5"-SBC-i1200 > > + items: > > + - const: kontron,3-5-sbc-i1200 > > And then it should be part of earlier entry. Just take a look there in > the file... FWIW I did and all the entries with descriptions are by there own (that's also true for fsl.yaml and sunxi.yaml). mediatek.yaml seems to have both, either boards without description like the "radxa,nio-12l" which you are probably referring to. Or boards which has the same sub compatibles but still have individual entries, like google,burnet, google,cozmo, google,damu. Therefore, what is the rule of thumb here? Drop the description? If so, why it it there in the first place? -michael
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
