Jisheng Zhang wrote: > Hi Emil, Linus, > > commit f34fd6ee1be8 ("gpio: dwapb: Use generic request, free and > set_config") breaks all current dwapb gpio DT users, for example, getting > cd-gpios will always fail as -EPROBE_DEFER. Before the commit, > dwapb_gpio_set_config() returns -ENOTSUPP for !PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE > then gpio_set_config_with_argument_optional() will happily ignore > -ENOTSUPP. After the commit, dwapb_gpio_set_config() will return > -EPROBE_DEFER unless the gpio-ranges are set in DT. > > The key problem here is: almost all dwapb gpio DT users don't set > the gpio-ranges DT property, so I guess current dwapb gpio DT users > have this problem and the commit also breaks old DT compatbility. > So could we getback to previous behavior? Hi Jisheng It seems like the gpiochip_generic_request() and gpiochip_generic_free() functions have guards to handle when gpio-ranges are not set that gpiochip_generic_config() lacks. Could you try the patch below? Otherwise I'm also fine with just reverting the patch if this is not the right solution. /Emil diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 8b3a0f45b574..e434e8cc1229 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2042,6 +2042,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_generic_free); int gpiochip_generic_config(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, unsigned long config) { +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL + if (list_empty(&gc->gpiodev->pin_ranges)) + return -ENOTSUPP; +#endif + return pinctrl_gpio_set_config(gc, offset, config); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_generic_config);