Hi Dmitry,
On 2/16/2024 4:18 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Hi Jishnu,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 12:39, Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please disable sending HTML emails in your email client. It is
generally frowned upon, it complicates replying, it breaks quotations,
etc.
Sorry, I'm not sure how that happened, but I have fixed it now.
Hi Krzysztof,
On 1/4/2024 1:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 31/12/2023 18:12, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
For the PMIC5-Gen3 type PMICs, ADC peripheral is present in HW for the
following PMICs: PMK8550, PM8550, PM8550B and PM8550VX PMICs.
+
+ qcom,adc-tm:
+ description: |
+ Indicates if ADC_TM monitoring is done on this channel.
+ Defined for compatible property "qcom,spmi-adc5-gen3".
You are describing qcom,spmi-adc5-gen3, are you not? So this phrase
adds nothing.
Yes, I'll remove this.
+ This is the same functionality as in the existing QCOM ADC_TM
+ device, documented at devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.yaml.
+ type: boolean
+
Why do you duplicate entire vadc file? Why it cannot be part of that
file? Oh wait, it was in v2.
You now duplicated a lot of property definitions without clear reason.
If this is intention, then you need to put them in common schema.
Many of the properties used for earlier QCOM VADC devices will be used for this device too.....do you mean I can add a new schema file (named something like qcom,vadc.yaml) and move common properties into it (like qcom,hw-settle-time, qcom,decimation, etc) from this file and qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml?
Can I do it in the same patch or should it be a separate patch coming before this one ?
I'd say, separate patch. Move first, extend later.
OK, I'll make it this way if no one else has any objections.
Thanks,
Jishnu