Hi Ulf,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 3:56 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:11 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:34, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This patch series adds initial support for the Renesas R-Car V4M
> > > (R8A779G0) SoC and the Renesas Gray Hawk Single development board.
> > >
> > > As both driver code and DTS have hard dependencies on DT binding
> > > definitions, most patches in this series are supposed to go in through
> > > the renesas-devel and/or renesas-clk trees, using a shared branch for DT
> > > binding definitions, as usual. For the PM domain patches (03, 04, 09),
> > > Ulf already offered to apply these to his pmdomain tree, and provide an
> > > immutable "dt" branch, to be pulled in my renesas-devel tree.
> >
> > Patch 3,4 and 9 (I dropped the copyright line in patch9, as pointed
> > out by Niklas) applied for next, thanks!
> >
> > Patch 3,4 are also available at the immutable dt branch for you to pull in.
>
> Thank you!
>
> I have pulled the immutable branch, added the remaining DT binding
> definitions, and queued all remaining patches.
It looks like you have applied copies of all commits on the "dt"
branch to the "next"
branch, so now there are two copies?
See the output of "git range-diff v6.8-rc1..pmdomain/dt
v6.8-rc4..pmdomain/next".
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
