Hi Andy, On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 18:49:49 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looking again into it, the allocation separately with linedisp structure > is indeed too much invasive. I prefer (as we save lines of code and deduplicate > the buffer at least for two drivers, including a new one) to leave this patch > for now. We may rework it later on. Do you agree? Agreed. The additional overhead is probably not worth it. If the buffer size needs to be increased later on we'll take another look. Robin
