On 12/02/2024 12:52, André Draszik wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 12/02/2024 12:30, André Draszik wrote: >>> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:18 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> I can drop it, but the actual problem is that what if downstream keeps >>>> changing aliases? They can do it... >>> >>> We won't care at that stage, downstream should have no reason to divert from >>> upstream for numbering at some point in the future. >> >> What do you mean by "no reason"? The reason is they can do whatever they >> want. Some project leader says: "I want this" and they will do it. They >> won't care about our upstream choice at all. >> >> And then what, you change it again? > > As I said above, we won't care if downstream changes again at that stage, so > no, I wouldn't plan on changing again. Then I am lost. What stage are you thinking? What differs between now and let's say 1 month for the GS101 which was released more than three years ago? BTW, the aliases I see in downstream DTS (gs101-usi.dtsi) - since beginning up to Android 14 are: hsi2c8 = &hsi2c_8; hsi2c9 = &hsi2c_9; hsi2c10 = &hsi2c_10; hsi2c11 = &hsi2c_11; hsi2c12 = &hsi2c_12; They were set like this in 2020 and never changed afterwards. Best regards, Krzysztof