Am 03.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Conor Dooley: > Hey, > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 05:10:49PM +0100, Josua Mayer wrote: >> Convert the abracon abx80x rtc text bindings to dt-schema format. >> >> In addition to the text description reference generic interrupts >> properties and add an example. >> >> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- ... >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/abracon,abx80x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/abracon,abx80x.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..405b386a54b0 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/abracon,abx80x.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/abracon,abx80x.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: Abracon ABX80X I2C ultra low power RTC/Alarm chip >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Ideally you put someone here, not the DT list. Usually the original > author is a good choice, which I think happens to be the subsystem > maintainer... Failing that, the rtc subsystem list is likely a better > choice than the DT one. rtc-abx80x.c mentions: MODULE_AUTHOR("Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxxxx>"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>"); I personally prefer to put a list, since I don't know status of first author, and second author / rtc subsystem maintainer is automatic. So v5 will feature linux-rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
