On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:47:26PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:13:37PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 06:30:48PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 01:44:31AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:11:27AM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > > > > > Add an outbound iATU-capable memory-region which will be used to send PCIe > > > > > message (such as PME_Turn_Off) to peripheral. So all platforms can use > > > > > common method to send out PME_Turn_Off message by using one outbound iATU. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml > > > > > index 022055edbf9e6..25a5420a9ce1e 100644 > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml > > > > > @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ properties: > > > > > > > > > Outbound iATU-capable memory-region which will be used to access > > > > > the peripheral PCIe devices configuration space. > > > > > const: config > > > > > + - description: > > > > > + Outbound iATU-capable memory-region which will be used to send > > > > > + PCIe message (such as PME_Turn_Off) to peripheral. > > > > > + const: msg > > > > > > > > Note there is a good chance Rob won't like this change. AFAIR he > > > > already expressed a concern regarding having the "config" reg-name > > > > describing a memory space within the outbound iATU memory which is > > > > normally defined by the "ranges" property. Adding a new reg-entry with > > > > similar semantics I guess won't receive warm welcome. > > > > > > I do think it is a bit questionable. Ideally, the driver could > > > just configure this on its own. However, since we don't describe all of > > > the CPU address space (that's input to the iATU) already, that's not > > > going to be possible. I suppose we could fix that, but then config space > > > would have to be handled differently too. > > > > Sorry, I have not understand what your means. Do you means, you want > > a "cpu-space", for example, 0x8000000 - 0x9000000 for all ATU. > > > > Then allocated some space to 'config', 'io', 'memory' and this 'msg'. > > @rob: > > So far, I think "msg" is feasilbe solution. Or give me some little > detail direction? Found the Rob' note about the iATU-space chunks utilized in the reg property: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CAL_JsqLp7QVgxrAZkW=z38iB7SV5VeWH1O6s+DVCm9p338Czdw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ So basically Rob meant back then that either originally we should have defined a new reg-name like "atu-out" with the entire outbound iATU CPU-space specified and unpin the regions like "config"/"ecam"/"msg"/etc from there in the driver or, well, stick to the chunking further. The later path was chosen after the patch with the "ecam" reg-name was accepted (see the link above). Really ECAM/config space access, custom TLP messages, legacy interrupt TLPs, etc are all application-specific features. Each of them is implemented based on a bit specific but basically the same outbound iATU engine setup. Thus from the "DT is a hardware description" point of view it would have been enough to describe the entire outbound iATU CPU address space and then let the software do the space reconfiguration in runtime based on it' application needs. * Rob, correct me if am wrong. On the other hand it's possible to have more than one disjoint CPU address region handled by the outbound iATU (especially if there is no AXI-bridge enabled, see XALI - application transmit client interfaces in HW manual). Thus having a single reg-property might get to be inapplicable in some cases. Thinking about that got me to an idea. What about just extending the PCIe "ranges" property flags (IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS) with the new ones in this case indicating the TLP Msg mapping? Thus we can avoid creating app-specific reg-names and use the flag to define a custom memory range for the TLP messages generation. At some point it can be also utilized for the config-space mapping. What do you think? -Serge(y) > > Frank > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > Rob
