On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 10:53:28AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/02/2024 10:47, Ding, Shenghao wrote: > > dix4192 is not traditional ADC or DAC, but an Integrated Digital Audio Interface > > Receiver and Transmitter, like an audio bridge to connect different digital audio > > protocol, compatible with the AES3, S/PDIF, IEC 60958, and EIAJ CP-1201 > > interface standards, Left-Justified, Right-Justified, and Philips I2S™ Data Formats. > > So keep it alone for professional purpose. > Hm, it is a bit surprising to see some PCM6240-compatible devices 100% > different from other PCM6240-compatible. PCM6240 is ADC. DIX4192 is not > ADC, not even DAC. How can it be compatible with PCM6240 in such case? I don't know about this specific example but many modern CODECs have a substantial digital component which can usefully be used separately to the analog components in some system designs, sometimes that's still got the digital parts of the ADCs/DACs as PDM inputs and outputs are used but not always even that. We have some devices that are just pure S/PDIF bridges in tree already, and the WM8996 is an example of a CODEC with only PDM.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
