On 1/22/24 12:09, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote:
> On 1/21/24 15:32, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:25:57PM +0200, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote:
>>> On 1/19/24 18:14, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 04:11:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:02:28PM +0200, Ghennadi Procopciuc (OSS) wrote:
>>>>>> From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add the SCMI clock IDs for the uSDHC controller present on
>>>>>> S32G SoCs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..739f98a924c3
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) */
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Copyright 2020-2024 NXP
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_SCMI_CLK_S32G_H
>>>>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_SCMI_CLK_S32G_H
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/* uSDHC */
>>>>>> +#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_AHB 31
>>>>>> +#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_MODULE 32
>>>>>> +#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_CORE 33
>>>>>> +#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_MOD32K 34
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do these numbers not start at 0?
>>>>
>>>> Ah, because these are the SCMI IDs directly. If these are numbers that
>>>> are in the TRM, just use the numbers directly - there's no need to
>>>> create bindings for that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Conor,
>>>
>>> I appreciate you taking the time to review the proposed changes. I
>>> wanted to clarify that the IDs mentioned in the header are SCMI IDs
>>> exported by the TF-A and are utilized by the second patch of this
>>> series. These IDs are for the uSDHC controller to control its clocks. As
>>> other SoCs use this model, I have included all the necessary IDs in a
>>> dedicated header file:
>>> - rk3588s (arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi:97 [0])
>>> - stm32mp157c (arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-ed1-scmi.dts:73 [1])
>>> - stm32mp131 (arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp131.dtsi:1372 [2])
>>>
>>> Should I remove the header and use raw numbers in the uSDHC node?
>>
>> IMO, yes. There's no abstraction/binding being created here if they're
>> the SCMI IDs.
I included the suggestion in the second version of this patchset.
>> Thanks,
>> conor.
>
> Thank you for letting me know. I will make sure to include this change
> in the second version of the patchset.
>
>>> For
>>> example:
>>>> + usdhc0: mmc@402f0000 {
>>>> + compatible = "nxp,s32g2-usdhc";
>>>> + reg = <0x402f0000 0x1000>;
>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> + clocks = <&clks 32>,
>>>> + <&clks 31>,
>>>> + <&clks 33>;
>>>> + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per";
>>>> + bus-width = <8>;
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> + };
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi#n97
>>> [1]
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-ed1-scmi.dts#n73
>>> [2]
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp131.dtsi#n1372
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Ghennadi
