On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:05:11AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 15:22:40 -0500 Frank Li wrote: > > dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: add iommus property > > dt-bindings: net: fec: add iommus property > > arm64: dts: imx8qm: add smmu node > > arm64: dts: imx8qm: add smmu stream id information > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 3 ++ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml | 3 ++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qm-ss-conn.dtsi | 6 ++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qm.dtsi | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Any preference on whether all these go via a platform tree, > or should we pick up the net patch to netdev? I guess taking > the DTB via netdev would be the usual way to handle this? Supposed dt-bindings go through netdev tree. without dt-bindings, just DTB_CHECK warning. No strict dependence relationship between dt-bindings doc and dts file. Frank
