Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: rename vcc5v0_usb30_host regulator for Cool Pi CM5 EVB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2024, 13:21:56 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> 
> Hi Heiko:
> 
> 在 2024-01-27 21:09:46,"Dragan Simic" <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> >On 2024-01-27 13:15, Andy Yan wrote:
> >> At 2024-01-27 18:36:40, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag, 27. Januar 2024, 10:20:33 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> >>>> According to the schematic, this regulator is used both for USB30 and
> >>>> USB20, so give it a more appropriate name.
> >>> 
> >>> I don't have the schematics, so I'll need you to answer this, but what
> >>> is the regulator called _in_ the schematics?
> >> 
> >> There are two regulators called VCC50_USB_HOST1 and VCC50_USB_HOST2,
> >> and they are both controlled by GPIO1_D5
> >> They both for two usb 2.0 hosts,  not usb 30, the schematics make
> >> me a bit confused.
> >
> >In that case, I'd say that renaming the regulator to vcc5v0_usb_host is
> >fine, but there should also be a comment in the board dts file that it's
> >actually two separate regulators.
> 
> How do you feel about this ? Or some other style like:
> vcc5v0_usb_host1: vcc5v0_usb_host2:vcc5v0-usb-host-regulator {

I think we're using such a scheme in some places already, and
yes I really like going this way. So that the phandles follow the
schematic names and we can still grep for things.


Heiko









[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux