Le 16/01/2015 02:17, Bo Shen a écrit :
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 01/15/2015 07:54 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:31:11AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> +static enum wm8904_type wm8904_data = WM8904;
>>> +static enum wm8904_type wm8912_data = WM8912;
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id wm8904_of_match[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "wlf,wm8904",
>>> + .data = &wm8904_data,
>>
>> Does this end up in the i2c_driver_id driver data or do we need some
>> extra code when devtype is assigned to check for an of_node and look at
>> the DT data instead? That certainly used to be the case...
>
> At the beginning I think as the same as you, and also add the code to
> get the data as I do in <drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c>. However, as I
> remember, I2C seems only use the compatible string after the comma, that
> means only for "wlf,wm8904", it uses "wm8904" to match. So, I remove all
> the code I added, and just keep these, and it can get the device type
> correctly.
>
> So, when I submit the patch and keep the code as simple as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
I don't understand what's keeping this patch from being applied. Voice,
do you mind re-sending?
On my side, I take the two patches that apply on AT91 DT (2/3 and 3/3).
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
