On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:16:44 +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Revision 2 is SW compatible with revision 1 but it is necessary to reflect > it in model and compatible properties which are parsed by user space. > Rev 2 has improved a power on boot reset and MIO34 shutdown glich > improvement done via an additional filter in the GreenPak chip. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes in v3: > - use allOf contains structure to avoid random chars caused by > additionalItems: true > > Changes in v2: > - Support older combinations > > I want to support all versions we created: > All of them: > -rev2, -rev1, -revB, -revA, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > > rev1: > -rev1, -revB, -revA, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > > revB: > -revB, -revA, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > > revA: > -revA, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > > And also single one are permitted: > -revB, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > -rev1, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > -rev2, "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" > > I didn't find a way to pretty much all the time force that there must be > both "xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26", "xlnx,zynqmp" that's why there is only > requested to have xlnx,zynqmp. If you find a way how to encode it please > let me know. > > --- > .../bindings/soc/xilinx/xilinx.yaml | 36 +++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
