On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:18:44PM +0530, Vineeth Karumanchi wrote: > "wol-arp-packet" property enables WOL with ARP packet. > It is an extension to "magic-packet for WOL. If it is an extension to "magic-packet" why does it not depend on "magic-packet"? Are there systems that would only support the magic arp packet but a regular magic packet? > > Signed-off-by: Vineeth Karumanchi <vineeth.karumanchi@xxxxxxx> > --- > 7c4a1d0cfdc1 net: macb: make magic-packet property generic > which added magic-property support and wol-arp-packet addition > is similar extension. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml > index bf8894a0257e..4bea177e85bc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml > @@ -144,6 +144,11 @@ patternProperties: > description: > Indicates that the hardware supports waking up via magic packet. > > + wol-arp-packet: Bikeshedding perhaps, but why not call it "magic-arp-packet" if it has the same function as the other property here? Thanks, Conor. > + type: boolean > + description: > + Indicates that the hardware supports waking up via ARP packet. > + > unevaluatedProperties: false > > required: > -- > 2.34.1 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
