Hi Krzysztof, On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 12:03 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/01/2024 01:19, André Draszik wrote: > > Now that we have hooked it up in the DTS, we can drop the > > Your driver patch cannot depend on DTS. Not for a new platform. I am > repeating this all the time last days... > > > CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED from here. > > > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c > > index 7f6c3b52d9ff..d55ed64d0e29 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c > > @@ -3393,7 +3393,7 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock peric1_gate_clks[] __initconst = { > > GATE(CLK_GOUT_PERIC1_SYSREG_PERIC1_PCLK, > > "gout_peric1_sysreg_peric1_pclk", "mout_peric1_bus_user", > > CLK_CON_GAT_GOUT_BLK_PERIC1_UID_SYSREG_PERIC1_IPCLKPORT_PCLK, > > - 21, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0), > > I don't understand. You just added this clock in this patchset. This > means that your patch #3 is incorrect. In patch #3 I'm hooking up all the clocks to Linux. If I don't CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED for the 'sysreg' pclk in patch #3, then it'll hang on loading drivers that require sysreg access (because Linux disabled the clock). I can not change patch #8 to come between 2 and 3 either, because at that stage neither the clock nor the DT node reference &cmu_peric1 actually exist, and the clock and can't be claimed by sysreg. Since we can not mix DT and driver changes in the same commit, I can not merge patches #3 and #4 and #8 either. I had to do it this way so that the platform always boots for every commit to keep things bisectable. Alternatively, I could merge patches #4 and #8 (but that seems wrong to me), or drop patches #7, #8 and #9 from this series and apply it later in the -rc phase? Is there a better way that you have in mind that we're missing, that keeps things atomic and bootable/bisectable? Cheers, Andre'