On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 01/23/2015 01:15 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > >>Your example is a relative simple one where you do not have any additional > >>audio fabric on the board itself. > >Right, and that's why I'd be glad to have quickly something in the > >kernel. More properties could be added later as there would be requests. > I'd agree if this was some kind of kernel internal stuff, but this is > creating ABI and we have to maintain it forever. Rushing this in without > proper discussion and consideration of the more complex use-cases is in my > opinion not a good idea. Just to repeat myself again: *please* try to provide more explanation for your commits, the concerns Lars is raising above are among the things that I'd have expected to be covered in a high quality changelog. There is no explanation at all in the changelog regarding the goal here, just statements that this is a graph based card without an actual card node.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
