On 1/23/2024 10:51 AM, Elliot Berman wrote: > > > On 1/23/2024 9:18 AM, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:50:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 22/01/2024 11:10, Amrit Anand wrote: >>>> >>>> On 1/21/2024 12:40 AM, Trilok Soni wrote: >>>>> On 1/20/2024 3:20 AM, Amrit Anand wrote: >>>>>> From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Device manufacturers frequently ship multiple boards or SKUs under a >>>>>> single software package. These software packages will ship multiple >>>>>> devicetree blobs and require some mechanism to pick the correct DTB for >>>>>> the board the software package was deployed. Introduce a common >>>>>> definition for adding board identifiers to device trees. board-id >>>>>> provides a mechanism for bootloaders to select the appropriate DTB which >>>>>> is vendor/OEM-agnostic. >>>>> Please extend CC list to more architectures? linux-arm-kernel, risc-v etc; since >>>>> the proposal below is not specific to ARM but any architecture is using the >>>>> devicetree. >>>> Wouldn't devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx will have concern folks from all the >>>> architectures? >>>> Please correct me. >>> >>> No. >> >> The chromium guys should get a CC on future versions of this stuff, >> since they like doing wacky things with compatible strings in their >> bootloader and this problem is one they also face. Doug Anderson and the >> mediatek chromebook folks would be a good start. >> > > Please CC Peter Griffin from Linaro as he helped restart this > discussion at Plumbers. > > Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Also, for the oneplus boards: > Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you everyone. Amrit - please take care of above comments when you post next revision and as suggested please add other architecture mailing lists using the devicetree. Thank you. -- ---Trilok Soni
