On 1/23/24 12:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
On 23-12-16 14:39:48, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 14.12.2023 17:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
From: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Add the camcc clock driver for x1e80100
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]
+enum {
+ DT_BI_TCXO,
+ DT_BI_TCXO_AO,
+ DT_SLEEP_CLK,
+};
+
+enum {
+ P_BI_TCXO,
Please don't overload this define with DT_BI_TCXO_AO, add a new one
for the active-only clock. Please also do this in other drivers in
this series.
Nope, that needs to stay if we want to align the dt bindings between
SM8550, SM8650 and this. At least for dispcc. But I would like to have
the same dt schema for the rest of the clock controller drivers between
platforms that share basically the same ip block.
No, you're confusing the dt ordering enum (the first one) with the
parent list enum (the one below that I'm commenting on).
Konrad
