Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: define USI8 with I2C configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/01/2024 09:57, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/23/24 08:44, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> However I don't fully understand why that dependency - except patch hunk
>>> context - exists. You shouldn't have such dependency.
>>>
>> Let me try offline, I'll get back to you.
> 
> The dropped patches depend on the dt-bindings patch that you queued
> through the "next/drivers" branch:
> 
> b393a6c5e656 dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101-clock: add PERIC0 clock
> management unit
> 
> We need the peric0 bindings that are referenced in device tree, that's
> why the next/dt64 branch failed to build.
> 
> Please let me know if there's something on my side that I have to do
> (now or in the future).

It is useful to mention this in cover letter, so I will know how to
apply the patches. I understand therefore the dependency mention in the
cover letter is not accurate, so I can ignore that aspect.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux