On 22/01/2024 19:21, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm limiting the audience of this compared to the PCI power sequencing > series as I wanted to run the DT part by the maintainers before I commit > to a doomed effort. > > Here is the DT representation of the QCA6390's PMU with its inputs and > outputs. If I were to implement the pwrseq framework that would be able > to assign the relevant pwrseq data to the consumer based on the actual > regulators and not abstract bt-pwrseq or wlan-pwrseq properties - would > that fly with you? > > We'd need to deprecate the existing BT bindings but unfortunately they > are already described as consuming the host PMIC regulators in bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> Please provide lore link to the binding. Best regards, Krzysztof
