On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 07:41:54PM +0200, andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:46:02AM +0100, Charles Keepax kirjoitti: > > + unsigned int hs2 = 0x2 << CS42L43_HSDET_MODE_SHIFT; > BIT(1) ? Given that this is writing a value into a register field called "MODE" it seems very likely that it's an enumeration value rather than a bitmask (and similarly for all the other places where you're making similar comments). Please think a bit more about the code being commented on when making these minor stylistic comments. > > +static const char * const cs42l43_jack_text[] = { > > + "None", "CTIA", "OMTP", "Headphone", "Line-Out", > > + "Line-In", "Microphone", "Optical", > Better to have this by power of 2 blocks (seems it's related to the possible > values ranges in the HW). > If it's just a coincidence that there are 8 of them, perhaps other (logical) > grouping is better? This is probably well within the realm of driver author taste... > > + // Don't use devm as we need to get against the MFD device > This is weird... This is normal, the splitting into subdevices is often a purely Linux internal thing and not represented in the firmware description so external resources are linked to the top level.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature