On 17/01/2024 10:21, Valentin CARON wrote:
>
> On 1/15/24 16:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/01/2024 12:24, Valentin Caron wrote:
>>> Add "power-domains" property in stm32 serial binding to avoid:
>>>
>>> serial@40010000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
>>> ('power-domains' were unexpected)
>>>
>> It would be better if you checked whether it can be part of power domain
>> or not. What if the DTS is wrong?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> I'm not sure to understand, but if you mean that there is no
> power-domains properties right now in all stm32mp device trees
> and so it does not required to add this stm32 serial bindings:
>
> Theses will be upstreamed in the future, and because power-domains
> property is optional, I can add it right now in stm32 serial binding
> to anticipate.
No. You used argument: "add because DTS has it" and I want different
argument: "add because it is the right thing to do because foo and bar".
If DTS is wrong, then your commit and this explanation is wrong.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
