>On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:27:59AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: >>>> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock >>>> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible >>>> string is needed for the new SoC. >>>> >>>> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml >>>> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml >>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ >>>> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml# >>>> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>>> >>>> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller >>>> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller >>>> >>>> maintainers: >>>> - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties: >>>> enum: >>>> - sophgo,cv1800-clk >>>> - sophgo,cv1810-clk >>>> + - sophgo,sg2000-clk >>> >>> I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering >>> renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a >>> different chip? > >> The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs >> don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least >> an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple >> rename. >> >> For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks >> like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new >> logic. > >I'm not disputing the unique compatible - you previously mentioned that >Sophgo were considering rebranding the cvXXXX series of chips going >forward and that one particular chip might undergo a name change. >I was wondering if this was that chip or just another device in the >series. > >Thanks, >Conor. For your question, this is the rename chip I mentioned. This is the name mapping I have known: cv1812cp -> sg2000 cv1813h -> sg2002
