>On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: >> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock >> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible >> string is needed for the new SoC. >> >> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml >> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ >> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml# >> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> >> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller >> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller >> >> maintainers: >> - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties: >> enum: >> - sophgo,cv1800-clk >> - sophgo,cv1810-clk >> + - sophgo,sg2000-clk > >I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering >renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a >different chip? > >Thanks, >Conor. Hi Conor, The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple rename. For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new logic. Thanks, Inochi
