On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:07:30PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Tue 09 Jan 2024 at 22:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Instead of accepting any value for sound-dai-cells, the common DAI > > properties schema should narrow them to sane choice. > Adding a constraint solely based on current usage feels wrong. > A DAI provider in its generic form must have the sound-dai-cells to > provide one. It says nothing about how many parameters an actual device > might need. That is the idea behind this binding. > It is up to the device specific bindings to define that value. > If restricting things here is really important, defaulting to 0 (with a > comment explaining it) and letting actual devices then override the > value would feel less 'made up' I tend to agree.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
