On 10/01/2024 00:55, Ninad Palsule wrote: > Hello Conor, > > On 1/9/24 11:14, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:05:53PM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: >>> Hello Guenter, >>> >>> On 12/12/23 13:50, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 12/12/23 10:51, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:00:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:15:51PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:40:03AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: >>>>>>>> From: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The NPCT75x TPM is TIS compatible. It has an I2C and SPI interface. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nuvoton.com/products/cloud-computing/security/trusted-platform-module-tpm/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Add a compatible string for it, and the generic compatible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 3 >>>>>>> Delete this from every patch that it appears from. >>> >>> I have send it as a separate commit. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20231214144954.3833998-1-ninad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> Why did you do that? It now just adds undocumented compatibles to the >> driver. Please, as Rob requested, work with Lukas on his series to make >> sure that these devices are documented. > > I think krzysztof kozlowski suggested to send these patches separately: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/1c5ace65-2fd8-4503-b22f-e0f564d1c83f@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Did I misunderstood it? Do you guys want me to include that commit again? My comment was in DTS thread under specific DTS patch. How did you figure out it applies to driver and bindings? This does not make sense. Best regards, Krzysztof
