> -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 5:24 AM > To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>; Swee, Leong > Ching <leong.ching.swee@xxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller > <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx; mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; > alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; > pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx; linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: stmmac: Enable Per DMA Channel > interrupt > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 07/01/2024 17:40, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Hello: > > > > > > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by David S. > > > Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 15:09:21 +0800 you wrote: > > >> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> Add Per DMA Channel interrupt feature for DWXGMAC IP. > > >> > > >> Patchset (link below) contains per DMA channel interrupt, But it > > >> was achieved. > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230821203328.GA2197059- > > >> robh@xxxxxxxxxx/t/#m849b529a642e1bff89c05a07efc25d6a94c8bfb4 > > >> > > >> [...] > > > > > > Here is the summary with links: > > > - [net-next,v2,1/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: per channel irq > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/67d47c8ada0f > > > > Please wait for DT bindings review a bit more than one working day (I > > don't count Saturday and Sunday, because we all have some life...). > > +1. Would be very nice to have some more time to review the rest of > the bits too. This would be specifically important for the STMMAC driver > which doesn't currently have active maintainer. What about 5-10 work days > to make sure that no comment would be submitted? Besides I thought that > no features were supposed to be submitted during the merge window. Are > we over the merge window already? (I might have lost track of time on the > holidays.) > > Leong, next time before re-submitting your patchsets please wait for some > more time than just two days. I waited for your response for almost two > weeks. > > -Serge(y) > Sorry for that, will wait 5-10 days before resubmitting v3 patches. > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > >
