On 09/01/2024 04:53, Xu Yilun wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:16:17AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> >> On 1/8/24 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 05/01/2024 17:04, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> Convert the generic fpga bridge DT binding to json-schema. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx> >>> >>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fpga/fpga-bridge.yaml# >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>>> + >>>> +title: FPGA Bridge >>>> + >>>> +maintainers: >>>> + - Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx> >>>> + >>>> +properties: >>>> + $nodename: >>>> + pattern: "^fpga-bridge(@.*)?$" >>> >>> Not sure, but maybe we need to allow fpga-bridge-1? Could we have more >>> than one bridge on given system? >> >> Yilun: Any comment on this? > > We can have more bridges, but IIUC people use fpga-bridge@0, fpga-bridge@0 > to identify them. So the expression is OK to me. So you claim unit address thus reg with some sort of bus address is a requirement? Then "?" is not correct in that pattern. Best regards, Krzysztof
